Young professionals in urban cafe contemplating future amid fertility decline
Young people worldwide are choosing careers over children, driven by economic pressures and uncertain futures

By 2050, Japan's working-age population will have shrunk by nearly 40 percent—from 80 million at its late-1990s peak to just 49 million. South Korea's fertility rate stands at 0.75 births per woman, the lowest ever recorded for any nation. China, once the world's population juggernaut, saw its birth rate plummet to 1.0 in 2023. Five of the world's ten largest countries have already fallen below the replacement threshold of 2.1 children per woman. This isn't a distant threat or theoretical concern—it's a demographic earthquake already reshaping economies, straining pension systems, and forcing societies to confront an uncomfortable truth: the world is running out of people.

The Breakthrough No One Expected

For decades, demographers warned of overpopulation. Today, the alarm bells ring for the opposite reason. The global fertility rate has collapsed from five children per woman in the 1950s to just 2.2 today. Between 1966 and 1993 alone, birth rates fell 40 percent worldwide—a decline driven by the advent of birth control, China's one-child policy, and rapid urbanization. But what makes today's crisis unprecedented is its speed and scope. Countries that were demographic powerhouses a generation ago now face irreversible population decline.

Consider India, long viewed as a nation of explosive growth. While its national fertility rate hovers near replacement level at 2.0, southern and urban regions have already crashed to European or Japanese levels—as low as 1.1 to 1.3 births per woman in some states. Turkey's fertility rate fell below 1.5, faster than UN forecasts predicted. Even Tanzania, with a fertility rate of 4.6 children per woman, has seen a 2.3-birth reduction over 44 years—mirroring the global trend despite its high baseline.

The implications are staggering. East Asia, Europe, and Russia are projected to experience significant population declines over the next 25 years. Japan's population is forecast to shrink from 129 million in 2020 to just 90 million by 2070. China's population will peak below 1.5 billion within the next decade, then contract. The United States, with a fertility rate of 1.59, now relies almost entirely on immigration to sustain population growth. As the governor of the Bank of Korea warned, "The current fertility rate constitutes a national emergency. If this trend continues, Korea faces an irreversible population crisis that threatens economic stability and social cohesion."

A Historical Reckoning: From Explosion to Implosion

Humanity has never faced a crisis quite like this. For most of history, the challenge was too many mouths to feed. Thomas Malthus famously predicted in 1798 that population growth would outstrip food supply, leading to mass starvation. His fears seemed vindicated in the mid-20th century when global population soared from 2.5 billion in 1950 to over 6 billion by 2000. Yet technology—from the Green Revolution's high-yield crops to the contraceptive pill—defied Malthusian predictions. Instead of starvation, we got demographic transition: as societies industrialized, birth rates fell while life expectancy rose.

The demographic transition model traditionally includes four stages. In Stage 1, high birth rates and high death rates keep populations stable. Stage 2, exemplified by 19th-century Europe, sees death rates fall due to improved sanitation and medicine, causing populations to explode. Stage 3 brings declining birth rates as urbanization, education, and women's employment rise. Stage 4 stabilizes populations at low birth and death rates. But Japan, South Korea, and much of Europe have entered a hypothetical Stage 5: birth rates drop so low that death rates fluctuate due to an aging population, and total population begins to shrink.

Historically, governments that feared underpopulation enacted pro-natalist policies. France, scarred by low birth rates after World War I, introduced cash subsidies, tax benefits, and paid parental leave. Sweden pioneered affordable childcare through its crèche model. Romania between 1960 and 1989 took an extreme approach, requiring each woman to have at least five children—a policy that produced a generation of neglected orphans. Yet even democratic, generous interventions have yielded mixed results. France and Sweden saw modest fertility increases in recent decades, but rates remain below replacement. South Korea has spent hundreds of billions of dollars since 2008 on cash subsidies, housing perks, extended parental leave, and fertility treatments—yet its birth rate continues to plummet.

What's different now is that the decline is accelerating in regions that were supposed to be immune. Sub-Saharan Africa, with a fertility rate around 4.6 children per woman, still stands as an outlier, driven by cultural and religious norms valuing large families. But even there, cracks are appearing. Tanzania's fertility rate has dropped from 6.9 in 1978 to 4.6 today. The UN assumes that fertility rates in high-fertility regions will stabilize or rebound gently. History tells a different story: every country that has entered the low-fertility trap has struggled to escape it.

Healthcare robot assisting elderly woman in Japanese nursing home
Japan leads the world in deploying automation to address labor shortages caused by its aging population

Understanding the Innovation Crisis

Why does population size matter for progress? Economics provides two answers. First, scale reduces fixed costs. Building a hospital, launching a satellite, or developing a new drug requires massive upfront investment. A larger population spreads those costs across more people, making ambitious projects viable. Researchers Daron Acemoglu and Matthew Linn studied pharmaceutical development and found that a 1 percent increase in market size led to a 4 percent increase in new drug entries. As the baby boomer generation entered middle age, the number of drugs tailored to age-related diseases surged. A shrinking, aging population reverses this dynamic: fewer patients mean less incentive to innovate, fewer treatments, and slower medical progress.

Second, ideas are non-rival goods. Unlike a loaf of bread—which only one person can eat—an idea can be used by millions simultaneously. Isaac Newton's laws of motion, Marie Curie's insights into radioactivity, and Tim Berners-Lee's invention of the World Wide Web benefit everyone, forever. A larger population generates more ideas, which compound over time. But a declining population produces fewer scientists, fewer entrepreneurs, fewer artists—fewer minds to solve the problems of tomorrow. Even modest population declines can create significant barriers to knowledge diffusion, service provision, and infrastructure projects.

The old-age dependency ratio—the number of people aged 65 and older per 100 working-age adults—has roughly doubled between 1950 and today. It is projected to double again by 2100. In practical terms, this means fewer workers supporting more retirees. Japan, with 30 percent of its population over 65, is a harbinger of what awaits other nations. Its pension system is under immense strain. Healthcare costs are soaring. Labor shortages plague industries from agriculture to eldercare. The economic growth engine sputters when there aren't enough young people to drive innovation, consumption, and productivity.

China faces an even starker timeline. Actuarial models project that China's pension system will run a deficit by 2028, with accumulated shortfalls potentially reaching 147 trillion RMB by 2050 unless major reforms are enacted. Even if China's fertility rate rose to replacement level—a highly optimistic scenario—the long-term deficit trend would remain upward. The only effective interventions are structural: delaying retirement age, controlling pension growth rates, and boosting economic growth through productivity gains. Population policy alone is insufficient.

Societal Transformation: The New Normal

What happens to a society when children become rare? Schools close. Maternity wards empty. Industries that catered to young families—toy manufacturers, pediatric clinics, suburban housing developers—contract. Meanwhile, eldercare becomes the growth sector. Japan's number of centenarians has reached nearly 100,000, 88 percent of them women. Nursing homes are full; there aren't enough workers to staff them. Immigration offers one solution, but Japan has historically resisted it. As one Japanese Times commentary noted, "The harder step will be opening inward to accept more immigration, the most direct answer to demographic decline."

Urbanization accelerates the fertility collapse. In cities, housing costs soar, childcare is expensive, and career pressures are relentless. A recent study found that 5.7 million American women aged 20 to 39 remain childless today who would have had babies if the U.S. had maintained pre-2007 fertility patterns. The authors concluded, "We're witnessing the systematic dismantling of American family formation." Young people consider having kids only if they can afford housing without surrendering half their income. Economic affordability is a stronger deterrent than cultural shifts.

In South Korea, marriage rates among women aged 25 to 49 fell from over 90 percent in 1990 to just 69 percent in 2020. Fewer than 4 percent of births occur outside wedlock, so marriage is essentially a prerequisite for childbearing. Why aren't young Koreans marrying? Women aged 15 to 64 spend an average of 215 minutes per day on unpaid household labor, compared to just 49 minutes for men. Nearly 65 percent of South Koreans believe that children suffer when their mothers work outside the home—more than double the U.S. rate. Rising educational attainment among women compounds the problem: as women achieve higher degrees, the pool of eligible men with equal or greater education shrinks. High unpaid labor expectations create opportunity costs that many career-oriented women refuse to bear.

China's "lying flat" movement epitomizes this shift. Young Chinese, exhausted by grueling work schedules and dim economic prospects, are opting out of traditional life milestones—no marriage, no kids, stay safe. Slogans like these reflect a deeper malaise. As Peking University sociologist Jia Yu observed, "People don't just consider their current situation—they ask what kind of world their children will grow up in." When the answer is bleak, fertility plummets.

Cultural narratives have also shifted. A 2024 Pew survey found that 44 percent of American adults under 50 do not want children because they prefer to focus on career or personal interests. A National Bureau of Economic Research working paper concluded that "the decline in fertility across the industrialized world is less a matter of specific economic costs or policies and more a reflection of a broad re-prioritization of parenthood in adult life." An NBC poll of Gen Z voters revealed a startling gender divide: 51 percent of women valued a fulfilling job above all else, while only 6 percent ranked marriage or children highly. By contrast, 34 percent of men prioritized having children. This "radical role reversal" suggests that traditional family structures are eroding faster than policy can adapt.

Benefits and Opportunities in a Shrinking World

Not all consequences of declining fertility are negative. Smaller populations can mean lower environmental strain. Fewer people consume fewer resources, emit less carbon, and place less pressure on ecosystems. Some economists argue that aging societies can still thrive if they embrace automation and productivity gains. Japan, for instance, leads the world in robotics, deploying machines to compensate for labor shortages in factories, warehouses, and even eldercare facilities.

Moreover, declining fertility in high-population countries like India and China reduces the risk of resource scarcity and food insecurity. A smaller global population could ease competition for water, arable land, and energy. From this perspective, the fertility decline is a natural correction—a transition from explosive growth to sustainable equilibrium.

Some research suggests that restrictive fertility policies can unintentionally empower women. A University of Michigan study found that after Chinese provinces introduced harsher financial penalties for additional children under the one-child policy, female entrepreneurship rose by 3.8 percentage points—a 40.9 percent increase relative to the average rate of 9.3 percent. Each additional child added 9.17 hours per week of childcare and 4.36 hours per week of housework for women. By reducing family size, the policy freed time that women redirected into starting businesses. Importantly, the survival rate of these firms was comparable to other women-owned businesses, indicating they were legitimate, sustainable enterprises, not desperation ventures.

Demographic decline also forces societies to rethink outdated structures. Pension systems designed for a 1960s workforce—retire at 65, live another 10 years—are untenable when life expectancy reaches 85 or 90. Delaying retirement to 65 or even 70, as China's actuarial models suggest, keeps the pension system solvent and allows older workers to remain productive. Flexible work arrangements, remote work, and part-time opportunities can help parents—especially mothers—balance careers and childcare, potentially stabilizing fertility without sacrificing women's economic participation.

Risks and Challenges Ahead

Yet the risks far outweigh the opportunities. A shrinking population threatens innovation, economic growth, and social cohesion. When labor forces contract, GDP growth slows. Consumer markets shrink, reducing incentives for businesses to invest. Pension and healthcare systems buckle under the weight of an aging population. The working-age-to-retiree ratio, once 10-to-1, is collapsing toward 2-to-1 in some countries. Even with automation, it's unclear whether productivity gains can offset the loss of human capital.

Inequality could worsen. In countries with declining populations, property values in rural areas plummet as young people flee to cities. Public services—schools, hospitals, transportation—become unviable in depopulated regions. Those left behind, often the elderly and poor, face isolation and declining quality of life. Meanwhile, urban centers gentrify, pricing out young families and perpetuating a vicious cycle of low fertility.

Geopolitical stability is also at stake. A shrinking China may become more risk-averse, reluctant to challenge the U.S. or assert regional dominance. Alternatively, it might act aggressively to secure resources before its window of power closes. A depopulating Europe becomes more dependent on immigration from Africa and the Middle East, fueling political polarization and identity conflicts. As Elon Musk bluntly put it, "It's just math"—but the human consequences are anything but simple.

The most insidious risk is the belief crisis. As one student told the author during a lecture on fertility, "If I'm already overwhelmed by pressure, why would I want to bring a child into the same environment?" When young people lose faith in the future—when they doubt that hard work will be rewarded, that their children will have opportunities, that society will support them—no amount of cash subsidies or tax breaks will change their minds. China began accepting applications for a nationwide childcare subsidy retroactive to January 2023, but early results are disappointing. Subsidies and bonuses are unlikely to stem the decline unless policies address this deeper malaise.

Pronatalist measures that reinforce traditional gender roles risk backfiring. Policies that place the caregiving burden on women while offering little support for men or shared responsibility only deepen the problem. As one analysis noted, "If the education system is careerist, materialist, and hedonistic, then spending money on that is only going to drive us deeper into the ditch." Without a cultural shift that values family formation and distributes caregiving responsibilities equitably, financial incentives will fail.

Multigenerational family dinner with empty chairs representing demographic shift
Traditional family structures are transforming as fertility rates fall and societies age, leaving visible gaps in generational continuity

Global Perspectives: Divergent Paths

Different cultures are confronting the fertility crisis in starkly different ways. France and Sweden, with their generous family policies, have managed to keep fertility rates around 1.8 to 1.9—higher than most European peers, though still below replacement. Germany has invested heavily in childcare and parental leave, yet its fertility rate remains near 1.5. Italy and Spain, mired in economic stagnation and youth unemployment, languish around 1.2.

In East Asia, cultural factors exacerbate the decline. Confucian values emphasizing filial piety and academic achievement create intense pressure on children, raising the perceived cost of parenthood. South Korean parents spend vast sums on private tutoring—household spending on education in Seoul grew by nearly 5 percent annually between 2007 and 2022. Japanese work culture, notorious for long hours and limited flexibility, leaves little time for family life. In both countries, gender norms lag behind women's economic participation, creating a painful mismatch between aspirations and reality.

Sub-Saharan Africa remains the exception. Fertility rates in Niger, Chad, and Somalia exceed four children per woman, driven by cultural norms, limited access to contraception, and high infant mortality. Yet even here, change is underway. Tanzania's fertility decline illustrates that economic development, female education, and urbanization drive fertility down regardless of cultural starting points. Women with tertiary education in Tanzania have a fertility rate of 2.3, compared to 5.5 for those with no education. Women in clerical jobs have a fertility rate of 1.6, versus 4.9 for those in agriculture. As African economies develop, expect fertility to fall—perhaps faster than anyone predicts.

Immigration policies vary widely. The United States, despite political debates, continues to welcome millions of immigrants annually, offsetting its below-replacement fertility. Canada targets 395,000 new permanent residents per year, explicitly using immigration to stabilize its population. Germany, facing labor shortages, has liberalized immigration rules, though integration challenges persist. Japan, historically insular, reported 3.77 million foreign residents in 2023—roughly 3 percent of its population, a small but growing share. The hardest step, as one commentator noted, is "opening inward to accept more immigration, the most direct answer to demographic decline."

Religion also plays a complex role. A study of the 1982 Baltic reforms found that generous cash and employment benefits increased the likelihood of childbearing by 24 percent among women aged 18 to 33—but only for those raised in religious households. Women from non-religious families did not respond at all. This suggests that pronatalist policies are most effective when aligned with cultural and religious norms. Brad Wilcox, a sociology professor at the University of Virginia, argues that advancing school choice and faith-based education could shift cultural narratives toward family formation. Whether such policies can reverse fertility decline remains uncertain, but they highlight the importance of culture, not just economics.

Preparing for the Future: What Can Be Done

Reversing fertility decline requires more than financial incentives. It demands rebuilding trust in institutions, expanding life opportunities, and restoring a sense of stability and purpose for the next generation. Here are actionable strategies:

Address economic insecurity. Young people need affordable housing, stable employment, and relief from crushing student debt. Economic affordability is the strongest determinant of fertility decisions, outweighing cultural or educational factors.

Promote gender equity. Addressing unpaid household labor through shared parenting, public childcare, and equitable workplace policies is critical. Countries with more equal domestic labor divisions—like Sweden—maintain higher fertility than those with rigid gender roles.

Delay retirement and reform pensions. Extending working years to 65 or 70 keeps pension systems solvent and allows older workers to contribute economically. This buys time while societies adjust to smaller, older populations.

Invest in automation and productivity. Japan's leadership in robotics demonstrates that technology can partially offset labor shortages. Governments should support R&D in automation, AI, and other productivity-enhancing technologies.

Embrace immigration. Immigration is the most direct answer to demographic decline. Successful integration requires investment in language training, job placement, and community support, but the payoff is a stabilized workforce and renewed economic dynamism.

Foster a pro-family culture. This doesn't mean forcing traditional roles, but rather valuing parenthood as a socially important contribution, providing flexibility for parents to balance work and family, and creating environments where having children feels feasible and rewarding.

Rethink education and work. Flexible work arrangements, remote work, and parental leave for both mothers and fathers can reduce the opportunity cost of childbearing. Education systems should prepare young people not just for careers, but for lives that integrate work, family, and community.

The path forward is neither simple nor certain. Some countries may stabilize fertility near 1.5 or 1.6, accepting gradual population decline while managing the transition through immigration and automation. Others may experience catastrophic collapses, with cascading effects on pensions, healthcare, and social cohesion. The UN's projections assume that fertility will stabilize or rebound gently across all countries—an assumption that history suggests is overly optimistic. If fertility keeps falling just a bit longer before stabilizing, the world's population peak could arrive decades earlier and at a much lower level than expected.

What is clear is that the era of endless population growth is over. The silent crisis of collapsing birth rates is reshaping our world in profound ways. How we respond—whether with denial, panic, or thoughtful adaptation—will determine the future of human civilization. The stakes could not be higher.

Latest from Each Category